Should individuals be allowed to sell their organs on the open market Research Paper

Should individuals be in allowed to sell their reed organs on the open commercialize in the U.S - Research Paper ExampleThose improvements would increase the deed of lives saved. Putting a social precedency in place and imposing regulations that require boon when possible will help to increase the number of patients saved by organ donation. In addition, opening the avenue of commerce for body part gross revenue from live donors will allow for more lives to be saved when the social concept that it is unethical is removed. The impartiality of the medical community is one of the primary concerns in the idea of making medical c are base to commerce. However, the United States already limits health care to those who mountain afford it. Therefore, selling organs in an open, still controlled market is not against the ethics of the medical community and will allow for more patients to receive the intercession that they need in order to promote longer, healthier lives. Organ transp lants Selling body parts for attain Organ transplants depend upon donations from the loved ones of mint who corroborate died or the loved ones of those who need an organ that can be taken from a live donor with still preserving that life. Blood can be donated in bulk along with plasma. Sometimes blood banks pay for donations of blood. However, selling organs is strictly forbidden, thus contribute to a burdened system that has long lists of people in need of transplants. When discussing the sale of organs, the cut downs that prevent this from occurring are based upon ethical standards of practice. These ethics are put into place for a reason however, framing the issue differently might provide an ethical way in which to encourage more available organs while still preserving the integrity of the medical industry. Examining the topic of organ donation requires studying health behaviors. wellness is a social issue, the ways in which health issues managed part of a social constructi on of behaviors in which medical personnel and patients interact towards defining the experience of illness and disease (Siegel and Alvaro 4). While the medical cognizance provides treatments for health issues, society creates structures for administering those treatments. The frustration that many patients have is that there is treatment available, but the necessary components needed, whether that be federal laws, money, or medical materials, are not available. At this point, the social system reveals one of its flaws. In the case of organ donation, the lists are much longer than the availability of the required organs. Thus, the drive for organ donation becomes vital in providing the quantity of organs needed to save those that are suffering from various diseases. When considering all types of transplants, including tissue transplants, the chances of a person needing some form is one in two people (Institute of euphony Committee on Rates of Organ Donation, 2006, p. 293). Accordi ng to UNOS (United Network for Organ Sharing) (2011), the total number of people who are active on the organ transplant list is 72,260 with 110,624 total on the list as of 207pm on April 1, 2011. The difference is caused by those who are on the list, but who are inactive because they have become medically ineligible, either temporarily or permanently. From January to December of 2010, there were 28,664 transplants from 14,506 donors (UNOS). This difference reveals a contrariety between the number of available organs to the actual need. In Africa, Asia, Europe and South America, the commercialization of organ transplants occurs, with renal transplants being one of the more commonly sold form of