Employment law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Employment law - Essay ExampleCase study 1 shows a rough-cut instance of what could be termed to as a misunderstanding or misinterpretation of a stead deep down the business premises. In this situation, a seemingly stolen item that is a hard platter is found in the cabinet belonging to two employees of the same firm, namely Janice and Kelsey. Both are employees with a good genius in the firm however the case of a hard disk found in their locker tends to jeopardize their good resume. Following a different approach to confront the issue should show that incomplete Janice nor Kelsey could be held reliable however this is not the case. Upon realization by the manager that the piece of hard disk has no entry in the stock records, some(prenominal) Janice and Kelsey are summ one and only(a)d by the manager in an act to discover the truth behind the recovery of such an item in their locker. Following basic serviceman instinct, both culprits result to justification of their own case s against the allegations of theft. In a more detailed view of each employee, Janice has been an employee to the firm for a period not less than two years, within when, she has been able to maintain a clean resume without any implications proving otherwise. On the other hand, Kelsey has been working in the firm for a period just over a year, but similar to her co-worker Janice, has kept a clear record, passim this time. Despite all this, both are considered guilty of the allegations of concealing the hard drive and face disciplinal measures that involve their immediate dismissal from their positions in the firm. Further information shows that the prior owner of the locker do claims of miss-placing his key to the locker some time back, this only making the decision to dismiss the two Janice and Kelsey slightly inappropriate. Such cases are very common in the business world, and with their increase, the managerial departments of firms such as the one in question should come up w ith the appropriate procedures to solve such cases. With the increased lack of jobs, advent to a conclusion of dismissal like in this case should be the last option, and viable only, when the culprit is proven beyond any reasonable doubt to be guilty of the allegations. Janice to her defense had stated that she had use the locker as usual and upon noticing the bag that was later revealed to be containing the hard drive, had thought to hers self that it was Kelseys and had no business with it so just ignored it. Kelsey on the other hand had earlier on come to her defense stating that she had not used the locker lately, and thus had little information regarding the hard drive. It is bare that the procedure followed that resulted to the dismissal of the two was neither very clear nor convincing that either would have really been considered guilty of the offence. Employment law governs that every employee in any organization of firm is subject to plum trial upon occurrence of such i ncidences. In this case, their cases of appeal against the dismissal came to a sudden crash, as the appeals were refused and both were dismissed. A working environment that has such personal property as lockers should have 24 instant surveillance, even making use of the latest technology in terms of CCTV cameras, which would have saved the situation